Is This Project 2025? I Believe So and So Should You
For years, I’ve been fighting a legal battle that seems more like a personal vendetta against me. The deeper I dig, the more it feels like my rights were deliberately ignored, and I was targeted not just by my ex-boyfriend, Daniel Geberth, but by a system that seems bent on silencing people like me. Could this be part of the ultra-conservative Project 2025 movement?
Project 2025 is described as a push to reshape American governance, focusing on empowering extreme conservative ideologies. But what happens when this ideology seeps into the courtroom and turns justice into a weapon?
In my case, Judge Catherine Peek McEwen and attorneys from the Solomon Law Group repeatedly disregarded my rights, often in ways that feel personal and hateful. Here are just a few examples:
Ignoring My Safety: Despite a no-contact order against my ex, Judge McEwen contacted the state judge handling my domestic violence case to find ways for my ex to depose me. She justified this by saying, “Who is not to say he feels like an enraged jilted lover?” (August 2, 2021). Why would a judge suggest allowing a known abuser this kind of access?
Mockery and Manipulation: The opposing attorney, Stanford Solomon, mocked my fears and questioned my credibility, saying, “She keeps making claims about stalking. Where’s the proof? She’s just paranoid” (November 18, 2021). Instead of stopping this, the judge allowed it to continue, deepening the trauma I was already enduring.
Dismissing My Concerns: When I raised the issue of stalking and threats, I was told by Judge McEwen, “We are not here to litigate personal disputes or hearsay about stalking. Stick to the discovery issues” (November 18, 2021). My concerns for safety were brushed aside like they didn’t matter.
Weaponizing the Courtroom: Judge McEwen even advised me to give up, stating, “At some point, you may have to make a decision about whether it’s worth it in your priority scheme to continue to fight this, even if you’re right” (November 17, 2021). It felt like she was telling me to choose between my safety and justice.
What makes this even more alarming is how these actions seem to align with Project 2025’s goals of controlling women, minorities, and those who speak out against oppression. My ex-boyfriend’s extreme political views, including his admiration for authoritarian-type leaders, only add to the suspicion that I was targeted because I didn’t fit the mold of compliance. Why would anyone permit an “enraged jilted lover” to spend millions after he threatened my life? Afterall, it was obvious that I had no money. I was in bankruptcy. I am disabled.
These are not the actions of a neutral, fair-minded judge. These are the actions of someone abusing their position of power to perpetuate harm. It’s hard not to see how this fits into the larger context of Project 2025, a movement that thrives on silencing dissent, targeting vulnerable populations, and protecting those in positions of privilege.
Judge McEwen’s actions allowed my abuser to weaponize the courtroom against me. Instead of protecting my rights, she used her authority to shield him and undermine me at every turn. This isn’t justice—it’s an abuse of power.
I’m sharing my story not to seek pity but to shine a light on how dangerous these movements can be when they infiltrate our legal systems. When judges and attorneys abuse their positions to silence and harm, it’s not just an attack on individuals like me—it’s an attack on democracy.
I’m sharing my story because this isn’t just about me. It’s about how easily the system can be manipulated when those in power prioritize their agendas over the law. If this can happen to me, it can happen to anyone.
It’s time to stand up against this. The courts should protect victims, not enable abusers. If we don’t push back now, who knows how many more will suffer? It’s time to demand accountability from those who abuse their positions and use their authority to harm rather than protect. The courts should be a place of justice, not a platform for oppression.